It banned soft money donations to political parties (loophole from FECA); it also imposed restrictions on 527 independent expenditures (issue ads only, not direct advocacy for a candidate). Declared unconstitutional by Citizens United case. Also known as McCain-Feingold Act.

Table of Contents

What was the result of the Supreme Court decision on Citizens United v FEC quizlet?

The Court ruled, 5-4, that the First Amendment prohibits limits on corporate funding of independent broadcasts in candidate elections.

How did the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United versus FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

The court’s ruling effectively freed corporations and unions to spend money both on “electioneering communications” and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates (although not to contribute directly to candidates or political parties).

What was the outcome of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 2010 quizlet?

Decided in 2010, in a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited, because doing so would violate the First Amendment.

What are the constitutional requirements for being a federal judge?

Believe it or not, the U.S. Constitution sets forth no specific requirements about who can become a federal judge. Federal judges include Supreme Court justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges. These are all nominated by the President and confirmed by the United States Senate.

Which of the following was declared unconstitutional by Buckley v Valeo?

Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance. A majority of justices held that limits on election spending in the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 § 608 are unconstitutional.

Was the BCRA unconstitutional?

The Court found unconstitutional the BCRA’s ban on contributions from minors and the so-called “choice provision,” which provides that a party committee cannot make both coordinated and independent expenditures on behalf of a candidate after that candidate’s general election nomination.

What was the main effect of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission quizlet?

What was the main effect of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission? It gave corporations the ability to make unlimited campaign contributions.

In which case did the Court declare that campaign spending is a form of constitutionally protected free speech quizlet?

Valeo, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on January 30, 1976, struck down provisions of the 1971 Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA)—as amended in 1974—that had imposed limits on various types of expenditures by or on behalf of candidates for federal office.

Why did the 2010 Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission change the concept of what we define as an interest group quizlet?

Why did the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission change the concept of what we define as an interest group? It recognized the right of corporations to express an opinion on a candidate.

Article first time published on

What are the constitutional requirements for being a federal judge quizlet?

There is no federal /constitutional requirements for being a federal judge. Describe the selection process of supreme courts judges. Supreme court judges are selected by the President and nominated by the senate.

What was the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in McCutcheon v Federal Election Commission quizlet?

On April 2, 2014, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in McCutcheon v. FEC that struck down the aggregate limits on the amount an individual may contribute during a two-year period to all federal candidates, parties and political action committees combined.

When asked if he had made any mistakes as president?

Legend has it that when someone asked Dwight Eisenhower if he had made any mistakes as president, he answered, “Yes, two. And they are both sitting on the Supreme Court.” If presidents appoint justices who share their ideological leanings to the Supreme Court, how is it possible for a president to make a “mistake”?

Is a separate view written by a justice who votes with the majority but disagrees with its reasoning?

A dissenting opinion (or dissent) is an opinion in a legal case in certain legal systems written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the majority opinion of the court which gives rise to its judgment. When not necessarily referring to a legal decision, this can also be referred to as a minority report.

Do you believe that the First Amendment should protect collective speech?

I believe that the First amendment should protect collective speech to the same extend it protects individual speech. I believe that our voices are more powerflu and productive when weaved together and for that reason the protection of collective speech could be a really good thing.

Did Citizens United win?

In 2010, the organization won a U.S. Supreme Court case known as Citizens United v. … FEC, which struck down as unconstitutional a federal law prohibiting corporations and unions from making expenditures in connection with federal elections.

Which statement describes Justice Stevens's belief about the outcome of the case quizlet?

Which statement describes Justice Stevens’s belief about the outcome of the case? Corporate money would make elections more likely to reflect the public will.

What does the Supreme Court do?

As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is “distinctly American in concept and function,” as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed.

How are all courts except the US Supreme Court established?

All federal courts in the United States are created by acts of Congress.

What are the exclusive powers of the Supreme Court?

(ARTICLE 3: THE JUDICIAL BRANCH) What are the exclusive powers (original jurisdiction) of the Supreme Court? The Supreme Court has the right to hear a case. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over cases that involve ambassadors, public ministers and consuls, and those in which a State shall be a Party.

Which US Supreme Court case ruled portions of the McCain Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act unconstitutional?

Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), often referred to as the McCain–Feingold Act.

What did the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act ban?

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002, also known as “McCain-Feingold”, is the most recent major federal law affecting campaign finance, the key provisions of which prohibited unregulated contributions (commonly referred to as “soft money”) to national political parties and limited the use of corporate and …

What is the term dark money mean?

In the politics of the United States, dark money refers to political spending by nonprofit organizations—for example, 501(c)(4) (social welfare) 501(c)(5) (unions) and 501(c)(6) (trade association) groups—that are not required to disclose their donors. … Dark money first entered politics with Buckley v.

What was decided in the Supreme Court case Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 2009 )?

Federal Election Commission that held that corporations could be banned from making electioneering communications. The Court upheld the reporting and disclaimer requirements for independent expenditures and electioneering communications. The Court’s ruling did not affect the ban on corporate contributions.

What did the Supreme Court rule in Buckley v Valeo quizlet?

What did the Supreme Court rule in Buckley v. Valeo (1976)? struck down limits on spending by campaigns and citizens, but upheld the provision limiting the size of individual contributions to campaigns.

What was the issue in Citizens United v FEC?

THE IMPACT OF THE CITIZENS UNITED DECISION In Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court asserted that corporations are people and removed reasonable campaign contribution limits, allowing a small group of wealthy donors and special interests to use dark money to influence elections.

What was decided by the Supreme Court decision Citizens United v Federal Election Commission quizlet?

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a US constitutional law case, in which the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions.

What was the outcome of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 2010 quizlet?

Decided in 2010, in a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited, because doing so would violate the First Amendment.

What was the issue of Austin v Michigan Chamber of Commerce?

Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990), is a United States corporate law case of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the Michigan Campaign Finance Act, which prohibited corporations from using treasury money to make independent expenditures to support or oppose candidates in elections, did …

What was the effect of the Citizens United decision quizlet?

The Court ruled, 5-4, that the First Amendment prohibits limits on corporate funding of independent broadcasts in candidate elections. The justices said that the government’s rationale for the limits on corporate spending—to prevent corruption—was not persuasive enough to restrict political speech.

What was the outcome of the court case Obergefell V Hodges quizlet?

Terms in this set (18) Obergefell v Hodges is the Supreme Court case where it was ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause.